In today’s competitive talent market, a sluggish hiring process doesn’t just delay growth—it costs you top talent. Research shows that the best candidates are off the market in just 10 days, yet the average time to hire in the U.S. exceeds 44 days for many roles. So why is your hiring pipeline stuck in slow motion?

Spoiler alert: it goes deeper than “good people are hard to find.” More often than not, the biggest hiring delays come from internal bottlenecks—many of which are entirely within your control.

Let’s break down the most common causes of a slow hiring process and, more importantly, how to fix them.

1. Lengthy Approvals and Decision-Making Chains

The Problem: Before a job posting even sees the light of day, it often sits in a purgatory of approvals—from HR to department heads to finance and back again. Later in the process, once interviews are done, hiring decisions can stall for days (or weeks) as stakeholders deliberate endlessly.

The Fix:

• Create a pre-approved hiring plan. Establish headcount and budget approvals at the beginning of the quarter or year. This prevents individual requisitions from needing full reviews every time.
• Limit the number of approvers. Too many cooks slow the soup. Assign a small group of empowered stakeholders to streamline the decision-making.
• Set SLAs (Service Level Agreements). Hold approvers to clear timelines, e.g., “All requisition approvals must be completed within 48 hours.”
  

2. Too Many Interview Rounds

The Problem: Interviewing is essential—but there’s a fine line between being thorough and wasting everyone’s time. Candidates often face multiple rounds, panel interviews, take-home assignments, and cultural fit meetings, all while the hiring team debates endlessly over minor preferences.

The Fix:

• Standardize your process. Define the purpose of each interview stage and limit the number of rounds. For example, a three-stage process: initial screen, technical/skills interview, final decision panel.
• Empower hiring managers. Give them the authority to make final decisions, rather than seeking universal consensus.
• Use structured interviews. Rating candidates against pre-defined criteria reduces bias, speeds decisions, and improves hiring outcomes.

3. Inefficient Communication Between Recruiters and Hiring Managers

The Problem: Recruiters and hiring managers often operate on different wavelengths. A recruiter sources candidates based on a job description, only to hear, “That’s not quite what I’m looking for.” Feedback loops are slow, unclear, or nonexistent.

‍

Read full article here